Sherwood Copper Corp. Sherwood Copper Corp.
Current Stock Quote:    
Last -   $1.05   High -   $1.12   Low -   $1.02   Vol -   164645   Chg -   $-0.09 
Sherwood Copper Corp.
Sherwood Copper Corp. Sherwood Copper Corp.

Sherwood Copper Corp.
Sherwood Copper Corp.

Sherwood Copper Corp.
Overview
click to view enlarged


Project Overview
Mineral Resources - Main Deposit Only
Resource Disclosure
Back In and Off Take Rights


Project Overview

In an effort to accelerate its production growth, in May 2008 Sherwood acquired 100% ownership in Western Keltic Mines Ltd., owner of the high grade Kutcho copper-zinc-gold-silver deposit in northwestern British Columbia. Western Keltic and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sherwood have been amalgamated under the name "Kutcho Copper Corp." and the amalgamated company is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sherwood.

The Kutcho project is a high grade copper-zinc-gold-silver deposit in the advanced development stage. The deposit is located approximately 120 km east of the community of Dease Lake, and 330 km north of Smithers in northern British Columbia. The Kutcho deposit significantly increases Sherwood's resource base and the project is currently being advanced towards a production decision.

Prior operators completed a pre-feasibility study evaluating the potential development of the Kutcho Creek deposit, the results of which were announced on September 5, 2007. Subsequent to acquiring the Kutcho project, Sherwood began reassessing the development plans by focusing on the rapid development of a smaller scale, lower capital cost operation that is focused on high grade production up front. In June of 2008, Sherwood completed a preliminary economic assessment which demonstrated positive base case economics and outlined several opportunities for significant future enhancements. The most significant upside opportunities, which are currently being evaluated, include increasing the tonnes and grade of material to be processed and improving metallurgical recoveries beyond those assumed in the study. Sherwood began a drill program in May of 2008 to provide information necessary to support its objectives and intends to issue an updated preliminary economic assessment in the fall of 2008. The updated assessment would incorporate several optimization opportunities including the results of the 2008 infill drilling, results from initial metallurgical testing currently in process and incorporating some of the more than 50% of the project mineral resources not considered in this current study.

In conjunction with these activities, Sherwood has re-commenced the permitting process and has engaged local First Nations and their stakeholders in the consultation process.

Back to Top


Mineral Resources (0.75 CuEq cut-off) - Main Deposit Only

Class

Tonnes

In situ Grade

Contained Metal

% Cu

%
Zn

g/t Ag

g/t   Au

Cu
(Mlb)

Zn (Mlb)

Ag (Moz)

Au
(000's oz)

Indicated

17,285,000

1.56

2.12

26.1

0.29

594.5

807.9

14.5

161.2

Inferred

367,000

1.62

1.77

23.6

0.13

13.1

14.3

0.3

1.5



The PEA only evaluated open pit mining of a portion of one of the three known deposits comprising the Kutcho Project, known as the "Main" deposit. The Main deposit is a tabular body of high grade copper-zinc mineralization that outcrops on surface. West of the Main deposit lies the poorly drilled Sumac deposit and, beyond that, the Esso deposit, the highest grade of the three know deposits.

The Main deposit is proposed to be developed as an open pit that would produce a total of 10.7 million tonnes (Mt) of mill feed and 54.3 Mt of waste over an initial 7.3-year mine operating life. Additional mineral resources remain within the Main deposit, as well as those in the Sumac and Esso deposits, that could potentially support an extended life. Sherwood is currently evaluating the possibility of extracting some or all of the remaining mineral resources in the Main deposit, Esso deposit and Sumac deposit, possibly by underground methods. These and other opportunities will be addressed in subsequent studies.

Production

The following sets out the copper, zinc, gold and silver in concentrates and estimated payable metal detailed in the preliminary economic assessment.

Kutcho PEA - Life-of-Mine Metal Production Forecast - Main Deposit Only

 

Year

 

Item

Unit

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Total

 

Copper in cons

lb ('000)

49,400

47,100

52,300

46,400

44,600

41,500

47,500

14,700

343,000

Zinc in cons

lb ('000)

67,500

56,700

63,400

52,800

49,200

46,700

57,100

16,100

409,000

Gold in cons

oz ('000)

6.8

8.0

7.4

6.0

4.9

4.7

5.7

2.0

45.5

Silver in cons

oz ('000)

653

705

734

643

585

574

613

232

4,739

Conc. grade

% Cu

30.3

30.3

30.3

30.3

30.3

30.3

30.3

30.3

30.3

Payable copper*

lb ('000)

47,700

45,400

50,500

44,800

43,100

40,000

45,800

14,100

331,000

Payable zinc*

lb ('000)

57,400

48,200

53,900

44,900

41,800

39,700

48,500

13,700

348,000

Payable gold

oz Au ('000)

6.1

7.2

6.7

5.4

4.4

4.2

5.1

1.8

41

Payable silver

oz Ag ('000)

588

634

661

578

527

517

552

208

4,265

*Copper, gold and silver are payable only within the Cu concentrate. Zn is payable only within the Zn concentrate.



Additional smoothing of production is planned post-PEA as part of an on-going process of open pit optimization, as well as evaluating options for extending the mine life by incorporating additional mineral resources defined on the Kutcho Project but not considered in the PEA, including the balance of the Main deposit and those in the Esso and Sumac deposits.

Project Opportunities

The preliminary economic assessment laid out the basis for the development of an open pit mining operation based on mining of the Main deposit only, which is only one of the three identified mineral deposits at Kutcho. Several opportunities for enhanced project economics were included in the study, a number of which Sherwood is already evaluating as part of its on-going work program. The most important opportunities to improve the project are:

  1. Increased grade of the in situ mineral resource as a result of in-fill drilling currently in process (In-fill drilling in 2006 on a limited portion of the Main deposit suggested potential to increase overall mineral resource grades versus that previously modeled -- with a comprehensive in-fill drill program underway, Sherwood will be better able to evaluate this opportunity by the fall of 2008);
  2. Optimization of mine plan following in-fill drilling to maximize grade and reducing stripping in the early years of the mine plan (an increase of 1M tonnes of mill feed at the average grade used in the PEA would increase the pre-tax NPV10% $12M;
  3. Increased life of mine production as a result of mining additional mineral resources from the Main pit (only 63% of the Main deposit mineral resource is extracted in the proposed open pit, leaving 6.3Mt that could be exploitable, depending on metal prices and costs, and extending the mine life);
  4. Exploitation of mineral resources from the other deposits already known (Esso and Sumac) which, together with the unmined portion of the Main deposit, comprise more than 50% of the total project resources;
  5. Reduced stripping by steepening pit walls, if supported by planned geotechnical drilling (a 0.1 reduction in the strip ratio increases the pre-tax NPV10% by $1M);
  6. Improved metallurgical recoveries in the process plant as a result of metallurgical test work currently in process (a 1% increase in recoveries increases the pre-tax NPV by $7M and IRR by 1%) and improved concentrate grades (a 1% increase in concentrate grade increases pre-tax NPV10% by $4M);
  7. Reduced energy usage as equipment is specified and sized;
  8. Reduced capital costs through expanded utilization of used and refurbished equipment;
  9. Reduced overall transportation costs of concentrate from mine to smelter (a 10% reduction increases pre-tax NPV10% by $3M); and
  10. Potential for lower than assumed TC/RC's, especially copper, where current rates are well below those assumed in the PEA (a10% reduction in TC/RC's increases pre-tax NPV10% by $3M).
It should be noted that the upside potential indicated above could also become negative if the factors are worse than expected. In this regard, the list can be used to identify which parameters might have the largest positive or negative effect on the project and risk mitigation plans could be developed.

2008 Work Programs

As a result of the recommendations in the PEA, Sherwood has an extensive work program underway to investigate the project opportunities identified and to mitigate the project risks. This work program includes:
  1. In-fill drilling the Main deposit in order to better define the high grade mineralization, optimize the mine planning and enhance the quality of the assay database;
  2. Geotechnical investigations to steepen up the pit walls and reduce the overall stripping;
  3. Evaluating the potential of an expanded open pit or underground extraction of the unplanned portions of the Main deposit immediately adjacent to the current proposed open pit;
  4. Evaluating the potential of the Esso and Sumac resources as potential sources of supplemental feed, possibly by ramp access out of the proposed open pit, extending the mine life;
  5. Extensive metallurgical testing in order to determine the potential for improved metallurgical recoveries and improved concentrate grades;
  6. Possible recovery of free gold in a gravity circuit;
  7. Conducting more ABA testing to better define the extent of potentially acid generating rock;
  8. Geotechnical and hydrogeological evaluations to optimize open pit planning;
  9. Re-engage the regulatory agencies to advance the Kutcho copper project through the permitting process.
  10. Re-engage the Tahltan and Kaska First Nations to attain meaningful and equitable IBA agreements.
An updated PEA is planned for the fall of 2008, incorporating some or all of the results from items #1, #3, #4 and #5 above, and a feasibility study in the first half of 2009 (depending on timeliness of work programs required to support a feasibility study).

Back to Top


2008 Exploration Program

Sherwood Copper commenced a drill program on the Kutcho project in May of 2008. The program will consist of a minimum of 12,000m of HQ and NQ core utilizing two drills. The principal objectives of the drill program are to:
  • Infill gaps in previous resource drilling programs;
  • Better define and test higher grade trends for expansion within the Main Deposit;
  • Demonstrate grade continuity in order to support a better resource classification;
  • Provide material for extensive metallurgical testing that will relate to a revamped mine plan;
  • Provide geotechnical and hydrogeological information for open pit design and for assessment of infrastructure locations;
  • Provide information to support project permitting activities and to develop a mine closure plan.


Back to Top



Resource Disclosure

Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. prepared the mineral resource estimate for the Kutcho deposit. Mr. Kirkham has reviewed pertinent geological information in sufficient detail to support the data incorporated in the resource estimate. Garth Kirkham, P.Geo. of Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. is the Independent Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 responsible for the resource estimate.

The estimates for copper, zinc, silver and gold were completed for the PEA Report dated June of 2008 using the MineSightTM 3-dimensional mine planning software system. The estimate was based upon a database comprised of 346 drill holes supplied by Kutcho Copper. The estimation process was constrained by a solid model based on lithological boundaries combined with grade contours. Assays were then composited into 2.5m intervals for statistical and geostatistical analysis to be performed within the constraining domains. A 5m by 5m by 5m orthogonal block model was created and Ordinary Kriging was used as the method to interpolate grades into each block within the solid domain. Bulk density measurements were supplied within the drill hole database and also interpolated into each block using Inverse Distance to the 3rd power as the interpolator. Individual blocks were then classified into indicated and inferred categories based on number of drillholes, number of composites, average distance to composite, distance to nearest composite and relative error. The grades and tonnages reported in the resource estimate represent the material contained within the mineralized portion (as a percentage) of the classified block below topography.

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Mineral resource estimates do not account for mineability, selectivity, mining loss and dilution. These mineral resource estimates include inferred mineral resources that are normally considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is also no certainty that these inferred mineral resources will be converted to measured and indicated mineral resource categories through further drilling, or into mineral reserves once economic considerations are applied.

Back to Top


Back In and Off Take Rights

Upon receipt of a feasibility study, Barrick and AMI, or Barrick alone, have a 120 day period to provide Western Keltic written notice of its intention to earn a 50% back in interest on the Kutcho property subject to aggregate payments equal to 300% of development expenditures on the Kutcho property. This would give Barrick and AMI, or Barrick alone, a 20% interest in the Main deposit and a 50% interest in the Esso deposit, based on the property definition per the acquisition agreements and as interpreted in the September 2007 Pre-feasibility Study. In addition, Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd. have right of first refusal on the sale of concentrates from the Kutcho property subject to a 30 day written notice period from Western Keltic.

Back to Top
Project History

Mineralization was first discovered on what is now the Kutcho property in 1968 by a joint venture exploration operated by Imperial Oil Ltd. The joint venture allowed their claims to lapse and, Sumac Mines Ltd., who had also conducted exploration in the area, staked several claims resulting in a cruciform claim outline overlying the western part of the main Kutcho sulphide deposit. Imperial Oil, later becoming Esso Minerals Canada Ltd., returned to re-stake some of the area in 1972, which resulted in a much larger area that encompassed Sumac's claims.

Beginning in 1973, both Sumac and Esso carried out exploration work, and their early successes prompted additional staking which resulted in claim boundaries roughly as they are today. Diamond drilling commenced in 1974, and by 1982 three sulphide lenses had been defined. In 1983, Esso and Sumac signed a 50/50 joint venture agreement for development work on Kutcho that culminated in a pre-feasibility study being completed in 1985.

In 1989, Esso sold most of its mining assets to Homestake Canada Ltd. who optioned the property to American Reserve Mining Corporation (ARMC). ARMC conducted additional exploration and engineering studies but relinquished the option in 1993 while retaining a 20% interest in Homestake's property. Homestake optioned the property to Teck Cominco Ltd. in 1992 who carried out deep penetration EM geophysical surveys. Teck dropped their option and Homestake was purchased by Barrick Gold Corp. in 2003.

Western Keltic Mines Ltd. purchased the property from Barrick and Sumitomo in early 2004. Western Keltic carried out diamond drilling within the Main and Esso deposits to confirm historical results and obtain material for metallurgical studies. The Sumac deposit was also drilled in 2005 to test for higher grade zones. In September 2007, Western Keltic completed and announced the results of a pre-feasibility study evaluating the potential development of the Kutcho Creek deposit. This study defined resources and reserves as set out in an amended and restated technical report filed on SEDAR on October 29, 2007.

In November 2007 Sherwood announced that it has entered into an agreement with Western Keltic under which Sherwood has agreed to make an offer to acquire all the shares of Western Keltic through the issuance of 0.08 of a share of Sherwood for each share of Western Keltic. Prior to this announcement, Western Keltic had been advancing the project towards completion of a feasibility study by conducting geotechnical and environmental baseline studies, as well as advancing the permitting process for approval of production. Western Keltic had also been actively engaged in discussions with the Talhtan and Kaska First Nations, as well as other local communities to ensure there is broad based support for the development of a mine at Kutcho Creek, while taking into account the concerns of the First Nations and other stakeholders.

In May of 2008 Sherwood successfully acquired 100% ownership in Western Keltic. Western Keltic and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sherwood were amalgamated under the name "Kutcho Copper Corp." and the amalgamated company is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sherwood. Sherwood's first objective was to reassess the development options of the Kutcho project and, in March of 2008, commenced work on a preliminary assessment aimed at a re-scoped and redesigned project that is focused on a smaller, less capital intensive high grade open pit project that could be developed faster than previously planned by Western Keltic Mines. In June of 2008 Sherwood completed a preliminary economic assessment which demonstrated positive base case economics and outlined several opportunities for significant future enhancements. The most significant upside opportunities, which are currently being evaluated, include increasing the tonnes and grade of material to be processed and improving metallurgical recoveries beyond those assumed in the study. Sherwood began a drill program in May of 2008 to provide information necessary to support its objectives and intends to issue an updated preliminary economic assessment in the fall of 2008.
MAP GALLERY

Proposed Mine Site
http://www.sherwoodcopper.com/i/maps/kutcho/2008-06-12KutchoClaimArea.jpg

Proposed Project Layout  
http://www.sherwoodcopper.com/i/maps/kutcho/2008-06-12KutchoProjectLayout.jpg

Known Massive Sulphide Deposits, Drill Holes, and Surface Topography  
http://www.sherwoodcopper.com/i/maps/kutcho/2008-06-12KutchoMassiveSulphides.jpg

Kutcho Proposed phasing of open pit on Main deposit (looking south)  
http://www.sherwoodcopper.com/i/maps/kutcho/2008-06-12KutchoProposedPhasing.jpg

Kutcho Long Section  
http://www.sherwoodcopper.com/i/maps/kutcho/KutchoLongSection.jpg

 Sherwood Copper Corp.
Sherwood Copper Corp.
Sherwood Copper Corp.
Sherwood Copper Corp.
Sherwood Copper Corp.